松江老城桑拿

更多上海桑拿会所体验报告:点击浏览
Because be in,the company is in charge of Mr Li high small l上海荤场子etter group in scold a boss by company discharge. Around dismiss action whether regulation of be good law, mr Li and company experience labor arbitration and forensic suit early or late. Recently, cou上海荤场ktv过程rt of people of Shanghai Pudong new developed area makes first instance adjudicate, maintain this to dismiss action lawful, the company need not pay break the law remove labor contract compensation. Mr Li is one ” 80 hind ” , assume office to cease from the one family letter inside trade division at Shanghai from September 2015 limited company of science and technology, hold the position of market sale chief inspector. Mr Li and this company autograph have labor contract of 3 years, the agreement fulfils the duty when adventitious, base pay 3500 yuan every months, performance pay 21500 yuan every months. On March 22, 2016, the small letter that Mr Li is composing by company salesperson group in give out ” Hello everybody, I should leave a company, the boss washs money, kite, salary can be sent only probably in April, everybody prepares early ” ” the money on Zhang is already insufficient, ha, just had looked today ” ” Laoliu (this company boss) h上海会所招聘 上海会所招聘ome of上海春会馆男技师油压泰安店 what kind of National People’s Congress is clear, ha, he washs money to cover now ” etc. On March 27, this company issue remove labor contract advice note, because the behavior such as rumor of Mr Li diffuse violates company rules system badly already, reason removes the labor contract with Mr Li. Mr L上海浦东全套水磨体验i is denied in small letter group in had published afore-mentioned opinion on public affairs, think the company removes labor contract is ill will cuts down the member of persons employed, arbitrate to controversy of personnel matters of labor of Pudong new developed area commit上海静安哪有桑拿会所tee applies for the arbitration 上海松江哪有洗浴大保健then, ask this company pays break the law remove labor contract compensation 50 thousand yuan. Arbitral committee did not offer sufficient evidence to prove the department co宝山500左右的荤场ntends for opinion on public affairs with the company is Mr Li place for hair, adjudication this company pays Mr Li to break 上海后花园1314侦探the law remove labor contrac上海贵族宝贝龙凤楼t compensation 35634 yuan. This company refuses to obey adjudication, to Pudong court to lodge a complaint. On the court, the small letter that this company takes out notarization of video, course chats use notarization of record and this company boss Mr Liu is in fixed phone to dial what work in the same place to 5 to c阿拉爱上海乌托邦论坛验证ommunicate the evide上海 桑拿网论坛社区nce such as recording. Mr Li argue says, its were not in small letter group in had published afore-mentioned opinion on public affairs, oneself use other small signal all the time for years, had not used the small signal that shows in video. 5 colleagues are to hinder only at feelings, chime in with others Mr Li上海会所微信公众号u. For this, mr Li was offerred to the court among them 4 communicate the person’s character explains. After the court is tried, think, communicate recording evidence shows, many colleague affirms Mr Li is in small letter group in had sent afore-mentioned message. Video evi闵行碧波泉4楼油压dence shows, small letter group in the name of the small signal correspondence that publishs afore-mentioned opinion on public affairs is Mr Li, before this information, 普陀区东新路spasomebody and this are small when signal chats with ” Li Zong ” proportional; Small letter chatting record shows, somebody sends Mr Liu a piece of small letter group chatting cut screen, content of this cut screen and before the content in narrating video is identical. Although Mr Li is denied had used this small signal, but the evidence that did not provide its to had used other small signal before March 2016. The evidence that Mr Li provides is the 阿拉爱上海同城对碰论坛桑拿written attestation of 4 colleagues only, proving to the notarial document that offers at this company loses on force; In light of the evidence that provides from this company, 4 people are not chime in with others, stated relevant content clearly however. Integrated afore-mentioned circumstances, the court accepts the position of prosecutor firm, maintain Mr Li to be in small letter group in opinion on public affairs is narrated before been publish. Mr Li not boss of quote proof company Mr Liu exists ” wash money to cover now ” wait for behavior, opinion on public affairs is嘉定大保健 narrated to should be maintained before for the rumor. Its are in small letter group in demagoguery, the relation between provocative company and employee, violated the regula静安竹蜻蜓spation of manual of this company staff, the compan上海普陀徐汇桑拿会所y removes accordingly bilateral labor c上海外围经纪人 上海外围女价格ontract is not had undeserved, this company need not pay reason compensation.